|
|
4
|
3
|
2
|
1
|
|
|
Task
|
All
areas of the task were addressed and handled with a high
degree of sophistication. The plan followed by the team
demonstrated a great deal of thought. |
At
least one area of the task was not addressed. The
plan followed by the team demonstrated a great deal of
thought. |
At
least two areas of the task were not addressed.
The plan followed by the team demonstrated a moderate
level of thought. |
The
task is incomplete and/or it is apparent that little
effort went into the development of the task.
|
____
|
|
Teamwork
|
It is evident that a mutual effort and cohesive unit
created the final product.
|
The team worked well together, but could have
utilized each other's skills to a better degree.
|
The team had problems working together. Little
collaboration occurred.
|
The final product is not the result of a
collaborative effort. The group showed no evidence
of collaboration.
|
____
|
|
Process: Originality and if the group's plan is
realistic |
The
ideas expressed by the body of work demonstrate a high
degree of originality. The Plan is very realistic and
can be done. |
The
ideas expressed by the body of work are mostly original.
The plan is realistic to some degree. |
The
ideas expressed by the body of work demonstrate a low
degree of originality. The plan is not very realistic. |
There
were no original ideas expressed in this project. The
plan is not realistic at all. |
____ |
|
Grammar, Format , and Spelling |
The
final body of work was free of grammar, spelling, and
formatting errors. |
The
final body of work had 1 error related to either
grammar, spelling, and formatting errors. |
The
final body of work had 3-5 grammar, spelling, and
formatting errors. |
The
final body of work had major grammar, spelling, and
formatting errors. |
____ |
| |
|
|
|
Total---->
|
____
|