TeacherWeb

Shepherdsville El. Universal Design for Learning



Top Divider

 

The Big Plan

 

 

 

 Shepherdsville Elementary

School Based Universal Design for Learning Grant

University of Louisville

College of Education and Human Development

October 10, 2007




 Significance of the Project

The Universal Design for Learning project would be highly beneficial to 
Shepherdsville Elementary for several reasons since we are a new school that 
is serving a challenging population. Currently our enrollment is 561 
students from preschool to 5th grade and our current level of students 
receiving free and reduced lunch is 72%. The present special education 
population in our building is approximately 14% with 50% of all students 
being referred to special education not qualifying. In addition, 
Shepherdsville Elementary also has identified achievement gaps in the areas 
of students with disabilities, male students, and students who receive free 
and reduced lunch. (See appendix A)

At Shepherdsville Elementary, we are fortunate to have an administrator who 
sees the importance of technology. Our principal, Mr. David Pate, has been a 
driving force behind getting technology into the classrooms. However, the 
presence of technology is not the same as the implementation of Universal 
Design for Learning (UDL) practices. Although some of our current teachers 
are making strides in the area of using digital media in the classroom, as a 
whole, it is still seen as an after thought. With this grant, we will be 
able to move to the next level and begin to incorporate Universal Design for 
Learning (UDL) practices as standard teaching practices in our school.

The two questions to be addressed by this grant are as follows:

(1) Will the integration of UDL principles into our daily curriculum allow 
all students to achieve at higher rates thereby closing achievement gaps?

(2) Will the integration of UDL principles increase the accuracy of our 
special education referral process by identifying students who continue to 
struggle despite the integration of UDL practices?

This project will provide the resources necessary to train a team of 
teachers (TAT, Teachers as Trainers) representing each grade level. Seven 
classrooms will serve as models teaching our staff and district about the 
benefits of UDL. However, we do not want to stop there. Each member of the 
TAT will be responsible for the implementation of UDL practices within their 
grade level teams. This will in effect allow us to train our whole school in 
best practices of UDL.

In order to carry out this great undertaking we plan to form a group of 
teachers to be trainers (TAT) and work with the School Implementation Team 
(SIT). The TAT will receive 5 days of professional development in UDL 
practices. After each professional development session the TAT will work 
with their grade level teams to implement and model what they have learned. 
All professional development will receive continued support during our staff 
meetings.

Quality of Project Design

This project will be divided into two different components. The first 
component will be to determine if the integration of UDL principles into our 
daily curriculum will allow all students to achieve at higher rates thereby 
closing achievement gaps. While student learning is the goal of every 
school, Shepherdsville Elementary is in a unique position to see whether UDL 
practices will make a difference in our overall student achievement. Bullitt 
County Schools has implemented the use of Think Link testing as a district-
wide assessment occurring three times a year. The first Think Link 
assessment was administered in September and will be our baseline for this 
project. Results of the September Think Link assessment will be used to 
identify those students who are struggling to achieve at rates commensurate 
with their peers. As UDL practices are integrated into our daily 
instruction, the future Think Link assessments will be used to document the 
success of all students, particularly those students identified in our 
baseline assessment.

The second component of this project will be to see if the integration of 
UDL principles will increase the accuracy of our special education referral 
process by identifying students who continue to struggle despite the 
integration of UDL practices. By creating this UDL environment our school 
will be closer to implementing the Response to Intervention (RTI) model. 
Data from the Think Link assessment, Success Maker, Diagnostic Reading 
Assessments, Scholastic reading Inventories, CTBS, and CATS will be used to 
document student growth.

UDL Practices and Daily Instruction:

It is the goal of this project for UDL practices to be used in every aspect 
of our daily instructional routines. This means that from instruction to 
assessment our students and teachers will be using UDL principles at all 
times. With the resources we already have in place, many of our teachers are 
already on their way to utilizing UDL practices in their daily instructional 
routines. The use of the LCD projectors and AIRLINERS to present digital 
text and media has become an every day occurrence in many rooms. For these 
teachers it has become a way of teaching and not just a last second 
modification to accommodate struggling students.

This year we have also pushed forward with attaining more of our curriculum 
resources in digital formats. This will allow a greater freedom for the 
students to access the curriculum in non-traditional ways. Students in our 
fourth and fifth grade classrooms are able to check out copies of the 
digital text books for school or home use allowing students a greater 
freedom in accessing the curriculum.

Finally, we are beginning to look at technology and assessment. This is 
still a new area to our staff although a few of our teachers are leading the 
way with digital projects. It is the goal of this project to help educate 
our staff on the importance of assessment based on UDL principles. As a 
result, we expect our school to reach more students at higher rates with 
better results.

Professional Development Plan:

Our professional development plan will center on training a team of people 
(TAT) who will be responsible for training other members of our staff. (See 
appendix C for Budget) The TAT will consist of the members of the School 
Implementation Team (SIT committee) and a representative from each grade 
level. This will allow each trained member to meet with their grade level 
teams and share what they have learned.

The professional development for this project will be broken down into four 
areas: (1) Planning for Universal Design Learning, (2) UDL and the 
Curriculum, (3) Student Access, and (4) UDL and Assessment. 

In order to carry out these trainings, members of the TAT will attend a 
total of 5 days of training during the school year. This will be an in-house 
training led by the SIT team. Each member of the TAT will receive 
appropriate materials and resource to support these trainings. In turn, the 
TAT will return to their teams and help model and teach UDL practices. By 
doing this we will have seven model classrooms set up and running during the 
school year.

The content of each session will be as follows:

1. Planning for Universal Design Learning will be a 2-day training led by 
the SIT for all members of the training team (TAT) to work through the 
Universal Design for Learning Facilitator’s Kit from Don Johnston 
Professional Services. 

2. UDL and the Curriculum will be a one day training for members of the 
(TAT) to work together with district and school level leaders to apply UDL 
practices to the core curriculum.

3. Student access will be a one-day training for the (TAT) to look at ways 
to incorporate UDL practices into student access of the daily curriculum.

4. UDL and Assessment will be a one-day training the (TAT) to develop 
practices in the use of UDL in the area of assessments.

Each of these professional development opportunities will be designed to 
model best practices of UDL and to equip the teachers with the skills needed 
to implement UDL in their classrooms. 

 

 

Quality of Project personnel

The personnel who have been chosen for the implementation of this project 
represent a range of abilities and qualifications in the area of Universal 
Design for Learning (Please see appendix B). The committee is made of school-
level administrators, regular education teachers, special education 
teachers, and a school psychologist. Each of these members share a 
commitment to excellence in the classroom and hold high expectations for 
student achievement believing that the use of technology is an integral 
component for the future success of all students. Each member brings a 
unique set of experiences and knowledge to the project while focusing on 
maximizing student learning as the ultimate goal.

This project is fully supported by our principal, Mr. David Pate, who has 
worked very hard to make sure that every teacher is provided with the 
resources they need to be successful. In the area of technology, Mr. Pate 
has been the driving force at Shepherdsville Elementary investing in 
AIRLINERS and LCD projectors for the classrooms. We began with six of each 
last year and as of October 1, 2007; we are up to 15 AIRLINERS and LCD 
projectors. Our goal is to have one in every classroom by the end of the 
year.

Direct support from our central office will come from three areas: The 
Technology Integration Specialist (TIS), the Assistive Technology 
consultants, the School Psychologist and the Curriculum Coach. These 
individuals are already connected to Shepherdsville Elementary as support 
staff from the district and have committed to supporting our move to embrace 
UDL practices. In addition, the Director of Special Education, the District 
Technology Coordinator, and Assistant Superintendent of Student Learning 
fully stand behind this project.

Quality of Management Plan

Table One:

OBJECTIVES
 ACTIVITIES
 PERSON RESPONSIBLE
 TIMELINE
 MILESTONE
 
SIT committee and training team will gain understanding of the UDL program
 Professional Development "Planning for Universal Design Learning"
 Project Director and SIT committee
 November 2007
 Training team completes 2 day training 
 
Training team will gain understanding in the area of UDL and the daily 
curriculum
 Professional development "UDL and the curriculum"
 Project Director and SIT committee
 December 2007
 Training team will begin implementing UDL practices in daily lesson plans
 
Training Team will gain understanding of how to create learning 
opportunities for student access
 Professional Development "Student Access" 
 Project director and SIT committee
 January 2007
 Student assignments will reflect students access to UDL practices
 
Training Team will gain understanding of how to create authentic assessment 
that is based on UDL principals
 Professional Development "UDL and Assessment"
 Project Director and SIT committee
 February 2007
 Student assessments will demonstrate the integration of UDL practices
 

 

 

 

Classroom teachers will receive training from training team on UDL practices
 Monthly Team Meetings
 Training Team
 Monthly November 2007 – June 2008
 Lesson plans will reflect integration of UDL practices
 
Faculty and Staff will gain understanding of UDL practices and language
 Monthly team meetings and Bi-weekly Staff Meetings
 Training team and SIT committee
 Monthly November 2007 – June 2008
 Lesson plans will reflect integration of UDL practices
 

 

 

Time Commitments:

The project manager will be responsible for over seeing the scheduling and 
planning of all professional development opportunities associated with this 
project. In addition the project manager will be responsible for milestone 
checks and the collection of evidence to support the progress of the 
project. Other members of the SIT committee will assist the project manager 
in these areas.

The TAT will be responsible for facilitating UDL practices at their grade 
level. These members of the TAT will meet a minimum of once a month with 
their team members in order to model best practices and train their team 
members. TAT members will also be responsible for establishing their 
instructional classroom as a UDL model.

District personnel will be available to aid this project on an as-needed 
basis.

Adequacy of Resources

Currently our existing resources in the area of technology are as follows:15 
LCD Projectors, 15 AIRLINERS (interactive smart board slates), 29 Computers 
in a Computer lab, 141 Classroom and office computers, Internet access on 
all computers, Enchanted Learning, A to Z Reading, Read, Write, Gold, 
Harcourt Kentucky Science series with digital text, Harcourt Social Studies 
Series with Digital Text, Everyday Math with Digital Text, 5 Scanners, Scan 
converters in every classroom, Televisions in every classroom, VCR/DVD 
players in every classroom, 1 Digital camera, 3 Document cameras, 1 Digital 
video camera, Teacher web pages for every teacher, voice amplification 
system in every classroom, Microphones and headsets for computers, Reading 
Counts, Destiny, Britannica Online, and United Streaming.

District resources in the area of technology include access to assistive 
technology consultants to help train staff members in implementing assistive 
technology in the classroom setting. The district also provides a Technology 
Integration Specialist, who provides strategies for integrating technology 
in daily lesson plans.

 Appendix B

School Implementation Team Qualifications

Katrina Lee

Katrina Lee is our half time Assistive Technology consultant and half time 
Speech Language Pathologist for the district. She began her career in 
Bullitt County as an SLP in 2005, and expanded in 2007 to the role of 
Assistive Technology Consultant. Prior to her employment in Bullitt County, 
Katrina worked with students with autism through the Kelly Autism Program at 
Western Kentucky University. This job provided Katrina with her first 
experience in using assistive technology to help students succeed. Katrina 
received her BS and MS in Communication Disorders from Western Kentucky 
University and her Rank I in Assistive Technology from the University of 
Louisville. Katrina has experience with several different types of 
technology, including: Writing With Symbols, Inspiration, Kidspiration, 
Intellikeys, Boardmaker, Speaking Dynamically Pro, Edmark Reading, as well 
as several different types of communication devices. Her responsibilities 
include assessments, training, and consultation in the area of assistive 
technology, as well as evaluating and treating students with communication 
disorders. Katrina’s professional affiliations include: American Speech 
Language and Hearing Association, Kentucky Speech Language and Hearing 
Association, and the Kentucky Board of Speech Language Pathology. 

Tyler Lee

Tyler Lee is our half time Assistive Technology consultant and half time 
Speech Language Pathologist for the district. He first started as a SLP for 
the district in 2005 and fall of 2007 added another role to his career as an 
Assistive Technology Consultant for the district. Tyler received his BS and 
MS in Communication Disorders from Western Kentucky University and his Rank 
I in Assistive Technology from the University of Louisville. Tyler’s 
favorite part of his job is the interaction of working with the students and 
trying to aid them in any way he can. His responsibilities include 
assessments, training, and consultation in the area of assistive technology 
and evaluating and treating students that have communication disorders. 
Tyler’s special interests and experience in the area of Assistive Technology 
include the following: Augmentative Communication Devices, Integrating 
technology in the classroom, alternate forms of assessment, specialized 
reading, math, and writing software programs, alternate computer access 
methods, and low tech solutions in the area of Assistive Technology. Tyler’s 
professional affiliations include: American Speech Language and Hearing 
Association (ASHA), Kentucky Speech Language and Hearing Association (KSHA), 
and the Kentucky Board of Speech Language Pathology. 

 Carrie Gary

I have received a Master's degree in elementary education from Indiana 
University Southeast. I have college credits in technology based curriculum. 
This is my fifth year of teaching experience in an elementary classroom. I 
have knowledge and experience of software/equipment such as: PowerPoint, 
word processing, excel, internet, airliner, projector, basic pod casting, 
digital cameras, and united streaming. Technology is an important part of my 
daily instruction in my classroom.


Rick Lumpkins

My classroom experience is brief as I am beginning my fifth year as an 
intermediate educator at the elementary level. This year marks my fourth 
year using technology heavily in my classroom instruction. I utilize Corel 
and PowerPoint as my basis instructional methods. My classroom is adequately 
equipped to support full technological instruction. I am heavily including 
embedded videos and on screen testing within my units. Technology plays a 
major role in my educational experience for my students. 

My relevance to this project would include helping to coordinate curriculum 
to fully utilize the materials and to assure that educators using the 
materials are getting the most up to date professional training that is 
available. 

My educational experience includes a rank 1 form the University of 
Louisville in Curriculum and Instruction, Masters of Arts in Teaching from 
Spalding University, and a bachelors of Science in Agricultural Entomology 
form the University of Kentucky.

Michele Grey

I am currently serving as a 4th/5th grade teacher at the intermediate level. 
I earned my bachelors degree and my masters’ degree in elementary education. 
I have also completed my rank 1 in technology. 

I am currently using technology as a daily part of my instructional 
practices. I am received training and am comfortable using LCD projectors, 
AIRLINERS, digital text, power points, document cameras, united streaming, 
and many other aspects of technology.

Amy Maddox, LMS/STC

I earned a Bachelor’s degree in Intermediate Education with an emphasis in 
Language Arts and Social Studies from Lindsey Wilson College in 1996.  I 
spent four years teaching 7th grade Language Arts and Reading in a low-
income, high minority school in South Carolina.  In 2003, I earned a 
Masters’ Degree in Library and Information Science from Spalding 
University.  Currently, I am the Library Media Specialist and School 
Technology Coordinator for Shepherdsville Elementary.  This is the fourth 
year I have held this position at the elementary level.    I have experience 
with both PC and Macintosh formats, and utilize daily applications for both 
including all Microsoft Office and iLife products.  In addition, I have 
experience using a variety of multimedia, presentation, and management 
software and hardware across both formats.

 

Megan Sayler

Megan currently works as a school psychologist for Bullitt County Schools. 
She has previous experience working in Fayette County and Scott County, KY. 
Megan earned her Bachelor of Arts degree from the University of Louisville. 
She attended the University of Kentucky for graduate school where she earned 
a Masters degree in Educational Psychology and an Educational Specialist 
degree in School Psychology. Her current research interests include 
executive functioning and neuron-psychology. 

Pat Wollam

I am a special education teacher that works with the students who have 
learning disabilities and mild mental disabilities. I earned my bachelors 
degree from Cumberland College in the areas of history and religion. I later 
returned to school and earned my Masters degree in special education in the 
areas of learning and behavior disabilities. I am currently working on my 
rank 1 in the area of assistive technology.

In the area of classroom technology I have been trained in or am comfortable 
using READ/WRITE/GOLD , Power points, Success Maker, Smart Board notebook, 
use of an AIRLINER, Use of LCD projector, United Streaming, teacher web 
page, and other internet resources.


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Appendix C

BUDGET – year 1 = $5,000.00

Materials 

Universal Design for Learning Facilitator’s Kit $535.00

Materials for training team $465.00

The Universally Designed Classroom 29.95 x 8 = $239.60

Teaching Every Student in the Digital Age 26.95 x 8 = $215.60

Misc. Supplies $ 9.80

Professional Development

In-House 2-day UDL Training of SIT and Team Leaders $1,600.00

"Planning For UDL"

1 day Training of SIT and Team Leaders $800.00

"UDL and the Curriculum"

1 day Training of Sit and Team Leaders $800.00

"Students Access"

1 day Training of Sit and Team Leaders $800.00

"UDL and Assessment"

Total Budget $5000.00

Bottom Divider

TeacherWeb
Last Modified: Sunday, February 15, 2009
©2009 TeacherWeb, Inc.