Student:______________________#___ Project Title:________________________ Experimental yes no
-20
|
|
Unsatisfactory (7 points) |
Satisfactory (8 points) |
Good (9 points) |
Excellent (10 points) |
|
Creativity |
Sloppy lettering, unbalanced layout, poor use of color (or none), layout makes project difficult to understand, no clear presentation of data |
Missing 3 or 4 of the following: Neat Lettering, appealing design, good use of color, trim or accents, balanced layout, graphs/charts make data easier to understand |
Missing 1 or 2 of the following: Neat Lettering, appealing design, good use of color, trim or accents, balanced layout, graphs/charts make data easier to understand |
Neat Lettering, appealing design, good use of color, trim or accents, balanced layout, graphs/charts make data easier to understand |
|
Completeness (having all the parts) |
Missing any one of these: Data, background info, conclusion, procedure |
Missing more than two of the minor parts (those not mentioned in the 2 point section) |
May be missing one or two of the following: references, problem, title, abstract |
No parts missing (per handouts and website) |
|
Scientific merit |
Lacking scientific soundness. Missing 3 or more of these: unsupported conclusion, unclear procedure, uncontrolled variable, insufficient background info, limited data |
Scientifically sound with the exception of 2 of these: unsupported conclusion, unclear procedure, uncontrolled variable, insufficient background info, limited data |
Scientifically sound with the exception of 1 of these: unsupported conclusion, unclear procedure, uncontrolled variable, insufficient background info, limited data |
Isolated variables,
plentiful data, conclusions well-supported by data, well-defined procedures,
background info develops ideas |