TeacherWeb

Mr. McGowan



Top Divider

 

 

 

Science Fair Projects

GETTING STARTED...

 

So, you have chosen to do a science fair project and you don’t know where to begin. Well, a science experiment is nothing more than a way to solve a problem. These pages have been created to give you some ideas and resources, show you how to start and take you through the scientific process.

 

A successful science experiment has several parts:

 

DETERMINE THE QUESTION-what is the problem to be solved

 

RESEARCH-a review of what has already been done by other scientists and gathering of background information

 

Hypothesis-determining what you think the answer will be

 

PROJECT PROPOSAL AND APPROVAL-all of the above items and a list of all materials, detailed procedure, and appropriate approval forms will be submitted for approval

 

EXPERIMENT-performing the experimental procedure and collecting data in the lab notebook

 

RESULT ANALYSIS-analyzing the data and forming conclusions

 

PRESENTATION-a good visual and verbal presentation is prepared to present your project to the class/judges.

 

WARNING-Most of those books with titles like 175 SCIENCE FAIR EXPERIMENTS YOU CAN DO IN YOUR KITCHEN don’t contain experiments at all. The activities are demonstrations of known scientific principles and do not involve manipulating independent variables to observe its effect on dependent variables. These will not be allowed for your science fair experiment. ASK YOUR SCIENCE TEACHER WHEN IN DOUBT.

 

 

QUESTION

 

A question may come from anywhere. For example, one student heard that some people think there is evidence that listening to music by Mozart, improves math skills. She decided to change this experiment a little because she didn’t really like Mozart. She decided she wanted to test other types of music.

 

Here is her question:

How does listening to different types of music affect students’ math performance?

 

A good experimental question will usually be stated in this form: How does_______ affect______? (The first blank holds the independent variable-the thing the experimenter manipulated. In this case it is the kind of music. The second blank holds the dependent variable-the thing the experimenter observes to see if there is any change.

 

It is important to choose a problem that you can solve. For example,” How does eating carrots everyday affect stomach cancer cells.” is not a project you can do without a cancer laboratory and researchers to work with you.

 

 

RESEARCH

 

Scientists always need to know what other scientists have done before them. They want to replicate previous experiments to see if they get the same results. Some other scientist may suggest an even better way of doing the experiment. You need to find out what information has already been discovered. You are not an expert in your field of study, so you need to know what the other scientists are publishing.

 

 

HYPOTHESIS

 

This is the part of the experiment where you make a guess as to what you think will happen. This shouldn’t be a wild guess, but an educated one. This means you should use your research to find out what others have observed before you decide what you think will happen. The hypothesis should be written in the “If, then” form:  If the independent variable is manipulated this way, then the dependent variable will change that way.  Some projects may have multiple hypotheses.

 

The girl that wanted to test the effect of music on math performance used her research about what others had observed and then wrote the following hypothesis:

If a student listens to music that he likes while studying math, then his math test performance will improve by 20%.

 

RESEARCH PLAN

 

Along with your question and hypothesis, a research plan includes the following:

Materials:  This is a complete shopping list of what you need to complete your experiment. Write it as a list.

1. CD player

2. CDs-Mozart, rap, r&b

3. Timed multiplication tests

4.    3 Human subjects

 

Procedure: This is a step-by-step instruction for what you will do to test your problem. You need to address how to handle all of your variables and controls. In this experiment, one independent variable (type of music) and one dependent variable (test performance) should be carefully controlled. For example, you probably wouldn’t want to test the subjects when they are especially tired because this might affect their test performance. You would not know if listening to the music affected their test scores or their fatigue. The easiest way to realize the variables that need to be controlled is to make a list of all of the things that might affect the experiment. This student came up with the following list of variables to control:

Time of day

General Health

Intelligence/Math skills

Age

Comfort

Difficulty of test

Practice

 

She addressed these variables in the following procedure:

 

1.  After dinner on day 1, I will give each subject in my experiment a test containing 50 multiplication problems. They will have exactly 15 minutes to work the problems. Then, I will collect the tests and determine the number of answers correct for each subject.  This is the “Control experiment” to obtain base-line data of non-manipulated results.  Experiments should have a “Control” to compare changes to.

2.  On day 2, I will play a Mozart CD for exactly 30 minutes during dinner. After dinner, they will take another multiplication test that is exactly like the first test except with different problems.

3.  On days 3,4, 5, I will repeat step 2 except I will play a different kind of music each day.

4.  After the 5 day, I will ask each subject which music he preferred and I will tabulate the scores for each subject.

 

Your procedure should also include the procedure for analyzing your data after it is recorded.

 

YOUR PROCEDURE MUST BE COMPLETE AND CLEAR ENOUGH THAT ANOTHER PERSON COULD DO THE EXACT SAME EXPERIMENT YOU DO.  YOU WILL NOT BE GIVEN SRC APPROVAL WITHOUT A COMPLETE PROCEDURE.  See the official Research Plan description from the SRC.

 

Scientific Review Committee Approval

 

All appropriate SRC approval forms must be completed in ink and turned in to the teacher in order to get approval.  No experiments will be allowed to be performed that do not receive approval.  Projects that do not receive approval by the deadline will not be allowed to be performed and students must change to the non-science fair project option for the spring semester.

<http://www.societyforscience.org/isef/about/rules_regulations.asp> is the ISEF website that contains information and all of the downloadable forms that you will use and all of the specific rules that apply to projects.  See your teacher for final clarification.

 

 

Result Analysis

 

This is the section where you show and discuss your data.  Usually students use tables, photos, calculations and graphs to show the data.  It is extremely important for Senior Level projects to use mathematical analysis in your analysis of the results.  This booklet contains a section on using the program Excel to statistically analyze and show your data.

In our example, the student calculated average scores and then compared them to each other with percentages.  A section of the student’s discussion of the results was:

The average score on the multiplication test were 14% higher after listening to Mozart than the scores with Rap or Rock and Roll music. Everyone’s scores were low with Rock and Roll.  There was no correlation between favorite music and increased scores.

 

CONCLUSION

 

This is the hardest part of the project. Here you use your data and observations from the experiment to make decisions and give reasons for the results. Your conclusions must match your data and discuss the validity of the hypothesis. You should include evaluation of the reliability of your results and practical applications. 

Part of the student’s conclusion was:

All subjects improved their scores from day 1 to 4. I believe this is because they got better with practice instead of the music helping, but it doesn’t explain why all of the scores dropped on day 5. Perhaps there is something about Rock and Roll that actually decreases math performance or that the subjects were too tired of the tests to do well.

According to my results, there does seem to be a connection between music and math scores, but not between preferred music and math scores. Because of this, my hypothesis has not been proven.

 

For my next project, I will test more people and I will test each kind of music more than one time. I will mix up the order of the days that I play each kind of music so that practice won’t make a difference.

 

As you can see, the conclusion draws all its information from the data. Also, included is statements about further research or studies that you may want to do as a result of the information you learned.

 

 

Here are some basic guidelines for writing your conclusions:

 

1.  Answer your experimental question based on your results. Does all music or just some music affect math scores? If it does, how?

2.  How reliable is your conclusion? That is, how certain are you that your experiment is true all of the time? Can you generalize from your data?

3.  You should identify any error of measurement you might have and tell how it may have affected the results. An error of measurement is any mistake that might have happened in calibration of your instruments, adding up your samples or marking surveys.

4.  Did something unforeseen occur that could have affected your results? This student played her music at dinner and gave her math tests immediately after that. But what if Uncle Larry dropped by and talked so loud they couldn’t hear the music?

5.  The sample size and the number of trials do make a difference. Here is the rule of thumb: a large sample (100) is always better than a small chosen sample. And more trials (5) are always better. Larger samples and more trials help you to verify your results.

6.  What else did you learn that wasn’t part of your experimental question? This student learned that besides, possibly affecting math scores, everyone in the room felt calmer after listening to the Mozart.

7.  What are the practical applications and uses of your results?  How can your project make a difference in society, the environment, or scientific knowledge?

7.  Ideas for further experimentation will result from the things you learned. Here you should tell what other questions you could investigate.

 

 

Project Presentation

 

The Abstract:

An abstract is a short version of your research project. It should be about 250 words, fit on one page, and contain no more than 5 paragraphs.

1.      THE PURPOSE- Why did you do your project? What was the question you wanted to answer? What was the problem you tried to solve?

2.      THE HYPOTHESIS- This is a “best guess” explanation of what you think your experiment will prove.

3.   PROCEDURE-

A.      Research- Briefly explain your research plan. How did you gain information about your project?

B.      Experiment- Mention the goal and outcome of any experiments. Did they prove or disprove your hypothesis?

4.      RESULTS- What were the most important facts learned from the project?

5.                CONCLUSION- What do your results mean? Can you compare the results to anything else you know? Do your results give you any ideas for future research?

 

The Project Display:

      The display is a visual summary of your entire project.  Everything associated with your display must fit into the space allocated for your project, which is 76 cm deep x 122 cm wide x 274 cm high if floor mounted.  Your display is your “silent” salesperson for your project and will include graphics, pictures, lettering, etc.  Check the specific display rules as you design and construct your display.

 

The Lab Notebook:

      A bound lab notebook written in ink should document the development and experimentation done during your project.  It is to be available to your judges to look at and you to refer to during your project presentation.  See the specific lab notebook guidelines in this booklet for more information.

 

Research Binder:

      Senior level projects are expected to have a binder of their research sources that they used in the development and analysis of their project.  This does not replace the shorter bibliography that is to be displayed on your board.

 

Verbal presentation:

      You must prepare a 3-5 minute summary of your project to present to the class and judges.  It very briefly outlines the first part of the project and emphasizes the results and conclusions.  Afterwards, you should expect to answer questions from the judges.


 

The Laboratory Notebook

 

The following guidelines are consistent with those of most major industrial laboratories and universities:

 

1.   The notebook should be prebound-not a loose-leaf or spiral ring composition book. A cover of stiff cardboard, covered with a fabric or thin chemically treated paper is preferred.  ONLY write in ink in the notebook.

 

2.   The front cover of the notebook should contain a title, which describes the research, and the time period covered for the data recorded in the book. If more than one notebook is used, then this should be indicated by adding that it is Volume I, H, etc.

 

3.   The first one or two pages should be reserved for a table of contents. All remaining pages should be numbered in ink, on the top outside corner of the page. The table of contents entries should be added as the project progresses.

 

4.   If your handwriting is not easily read, then you should print.

 

5.   The right-hand pages are for entries. Use the left for calculations, doodling, scratch paper, etc.

 

6.   All right-hand pages should be dated when information is recorded.

 

7.   Do not remove any pages. If a page needs to be deleted, a single diagonal line should be drawn across it. A brief sentence or two should explain why it is no loner being used.

 

8.       If an error is made, do not erase or obliterate it in any way. Draw a line through the entry and write the correction as near to it as possible. NEVER write a number or word over another.

 

9.   Photographs, computer printouts, etc. should be properly labeled and taped or glued to the right-hand pages.

 

10. All numbers must be recorded and labeled with the proper units.

 

11. When instruments are used, the name, model number, manufacturer, and setting should be recorded.

 

12. When chemicals are used, the name, formula, purity, and manufacturer of the chemical should be recorded.

 

13. A notebook is not supposed to be a work of art. It is a working document. It could possibly be stained, torn, etc. However, the entries should be legible, complete, neat, and logically presented.  A perfectly written lab notebook is going to be suspected as false and written the day before the presentation.

 

      14. This is a journal of your entire science fair project and should include even your earliest thoughts on the question, etc.  IT IS NOT TO BE WRITTEN THE DAY BEFORE THE PROJECT PRESENTATION.  THE TEACHER AND THE JUDGES CAN TELL!

.


 


PROJECT CATEGORIES

 

Common subject categories are used for the individual project competition in all three divisions. The Fair is actually composed of two fairs, both occurring simultaneously - each with Junior/Middle School (grades 7&8), Ninth, and Senior divisions (grades 10-12). Listed below are the categories that are included in the two fairs.

 

Engineering/Physical Sciences                                                           Life Sciences

Chemistry                                                                                                  Behavioral/Social Sciences

Computer Science                                                                                    Biochemistry/Microbiology

Earth/Space Sciences                                                                              Botany

Energy & Transportation                                                                       Environmental Science

Engineering                                                                                               Medicine/Health

Mathematics                                                                                             Zoology

Physics

 

ENTERING THE RIGHT CATEGORY

 

Every year, some students end up entering their projects in the wrong category. Since SEFH judges are required to

judge the content of each project based on the category in which it is entered, these students are seriously penalized.

Thus, we urge you to pay particular attention to the category that you indicate on the entry form. Once SEFH receives

the completed entry form, you will be required to remain in the category that you entered. Listed below are the

categories for individual project competition and a few examples of the types of projects which might be appropriate for

each category.

Behavioral/Social Sciences Psychology, sociology, anthropology, archeology, ethiology, ethnology, linguistics, animal

behavior (learned or instinctive), learning, perception, urban problems, gerontology, reading problems, public opinion

surveys, and education testing, etc.

Biochemistry/Microbiology: Molecular biology, molecular genetics, enzymes, photosynthesis, blood chemistry, protein

chemistry, food chemistry, hormones, bacteriology, virology, protozoology, fungal and bacterial genetics, yeast, etc.

Botany: Agriculture, agronomy, horticulture, forestry, plant biorhythms, palynology, plant anatomy, plant

taxonomy, plant pathology, plant genetics, hydroponics, algology, mycology, etc.

Chemistry: Physical chemistry, organic chemistry (other than biochemistry), inorganic chemistry, materials,

plastics, metallurgy, soil chemistry, etc.

Computer Science: New developments in software or hardware, information systems, computer systems organization,

computer methodologies, and data (including structures, encryption, coding and information theory), etc.

Earth/Space Sciences: Geology, geophysics, physical oceanography, meteorology, atmospheric physics, seismology,

petroleum, geography, speleology, mineralogy, topography, optical astronomy, radio astronomy, astrophysics, etc.

Energy & Transportation: Aerospace, aeronautical engineering and aerodynamics, alternative fuels, fossil fuel energy,

green energy science & technology, vehicle development, renewable energies, etc.

Engineering: Civil, mechanical, aeronautical, chemical, electrical, photographic, sound, automotive, marine, heating and

refrigerating, transportation, environmental engineering, etc. Power transmission and generation, electronics, communications, architecture, bioengineering, lasers, etc.

Environmental Science: Pollution (air, water, land), pollution sources and their control, waste disposal, impact studies,

environmental alteration (heat, light, irrigation, erosion, etc.), ecology.

Mathematics: Calculus, geometry, abstract algebra, number theory, statistics, complex analysis, probability, topology,

logic, operations research, and other topics in pure and applied mathematics.

Medicine/Health: Medicine, dentistry, pharmacology, veterinary medicine, pathology, ophthalmology, nutrition,

sanitation, pediatrics, dermatology, allergies, speech and hearing, optometry, etc.

Physics: Solid state, optics, acoustics, particle, nuclear, atomic, plasma, superconductivity, fluid and gas dynamics,

thermodynamics, semiconductors, magnetism, quantum mechanics, biophysics, etc.

Zoology: Animal genetics, ornithology, ichthyology, herpetology, entomology, animal ecology, anatomy, paleontology,

cellular physiology, animal biorhythms, animal husbandry, cytology, histology, animal physiology, neurophysiology,

invertebrate biology, etc.


 

PROJECT ABSTRACTS

 

Abstracts are of important assistance to judges and others who view your project.  You are encouraged to have extra copies available to distribute to your judges.  Remember that it must not list your name, teacher, school, district or anything else that might serve to identify you.  It should also be done neatly using proper grammar and punctuation.  It should not contain more than 250 words.  A sample abstract is shown below.

 

A SOLUTION TO POLLUTION: ENERGY FROM WASTE MATERIALS

 

Sewage sludge and solid wastes are an unavoidable by product of modern society.  High disposal costs for these waste materials, coupled with a projected increase in waste production over the next decade, form a serious problem.  This experiment was aimed at contributing to a partial solution of the waste disposal and energy shortage enigma.

 

For this experiment, sewage sludge, wood and sludge/wood mixture were pyrolized in a batch reactor to produce oil.  The production rates of oil were compared for the three materials.  The average production rates of oil from all materials were excellent.  The boiling range of the wood-derived oil proved to be slightly better than that of the sludge-derived oil, with the sludge/wood-derived oil being intermediate.

 

Sludge, waste wood and sludge/solid waste pyrolysis should be economically attractive, as the feedstocks are both renewable and inexpensive.  Plant attractiveness is increased when the costs of alternate methods of waste disposal are taken into account.

 

 

In general an abstract should include the following:

 

(a)     purpose of the experiment

 

·         An introductory statement of the reason for investigating the topic of the project.

·         A statement of the problem and/or hypothesis being studied.

 

(b)     procedures used

 

·         A summarization of the key points and an overview of how the investigation was conducted.

·         An abstract does not give details about the materials used unless it greatly influenced the procedure or had to be developed to do the investigation.

·         An abstract should only include procedures done by the student.  Work done by a mentor (such as surgical procedures) or work done prior to student involvement should not be included.

 

(c)     data

 

This section should provide key results that lead directly to the conclusions you have drawn.

It should not give too many details about the results nor include tables or graphs.

 

(d)     conclusions

 

·         Conclusions from the investigation should be described briefly.

·         The summary paragraph should reflect on the process and possibly state some applications and extensions of the investigation.

 

The abstract should not include:

a)       acknowledgements (including naming the research institution and/or mentor with which you were working), or

b)       work or procedures done by a mentor or a supervisor.

c)       the official ISEF/SRC form until the State or ISEF competition level


 

PROJECT DISPLAY

 

Prior to planning your display, be sure to carefully review the rules for project displays.  How you display your material; the color scheme you use; your use of graphics, pictures, lettering, etc. will all be important as you try to make your display serve as a "silent" salesperson for your project.  Where appropriate use the International System of Units (SI). Try to make your display a creative visual summary of your entire project.  See display rule section for comments regarding photographs.  Everything associated with your display must fit into the space allocated for your project, which is 76cm deep x 122 cm wide x 274cm high if floor mounted.  If table mounted, the height limit is still 274 cm, including the table that is about ____ cm high.  Most display boards are constructed of cardboard or foam core.  Expensive equipment should only be displayed when it is necessary for explaining project results.  If desired, videotapes or computer visualization of project action may be part of the display. 

 

 

 

This backboard example shows the type of information and material normally included in a project display

 


DISPLAY RULES AND SAFETY REGULATIONS


1. A student may enter only one exhibit. The student must be a full-time student in good standing at a SEFH affiliated school.

2. Completed project entry and approval forms must be on file with the Fair Office on or prior to the deadline date for entry, including the

project entry fee. Copies of these forms should also be available in a labeled folder at the display.

3. The exhibit must be set up in the category indicated on the entry form and at the assigned location.

4. The exhibit must pass inspection by both the SRC and Rules & Safety Committee on Thursday evening at the Fair. Exhibits not passing both inspections must be removed form the exhibit area on Thursday evening prior to closing time.

5. The entry exhibit must be the work of the student or team entering the Fair.

6. Repetition of a previous year's research project is not permitted. However, a student may exhibit new research on a continuing problem

providing the research demonstrates significant progress over the previous year. If the project is a continuing one, a Roman Numeral

should appear at the end of the title which indicates the years it has been entered in the Fair (e.g.-A Study of Houston Cockroaches - III) and the Continuation Projects Form (7) must be completed. Display board must indicate work for the current year.

7. Exhibit titles are limited to 6 words or less, and a maximum of 50 letters/characters.

8. The name of the student, teacher, or district must not be a visible part of the display.

9. Except for move-in and unpacking, the exhibitor is responsible for the set-up of his/her own exhibit.

10. No radios, TVs, tape players, or other sound transmitting devices may be played unless the sound is transmitted via headphones or the

devices are used as part of the display/project presentation. Laser pointers are not allowed.

11. Students for individual and team projects must be at their project during all judging periods. At least two team members of team projects must be present during judging. All projects will be judged within the scheduled judging times.

12. Disruptive students will be disqualified from the Fair.

13. Students are encouraged to provide judges with copies of a one page abstract or summary of their project; however, the material cannot identify the student, teacher, school or district.

14. Project laboratory notebooks for all related research should be available at the display for review by judges.


Unacceptable for Display

1. living organisms

2. microbial cultures or fungi (live or dead)

3. plants cannot be displayed in water or other solutions

4. taxidermy specimens or parts

5. preserved vertebrate or invertebrate animals or their parts

6. waste, rock, sand or soil samples - unless encased in acrylic

7. chemicals

8. human/animal parts (exceptions: teeth, hair, nails, dried animal bones, histological sections, and sealed wet mount tissue)

9. human or animal food

10. sharp items (i.e., syringes, needles, pipettes).

11. poisons, drugs, controlled substances

12. dry ice or other sublimating solids.

13. flames or highly flammable display materials

14. gases of any type

15. batteries with open top cells

16. items which identify the student, teacher or school

17. offensive audio/visual displays

18. operation of a class III or IV laser

19. any equipment or devices which may be hazardous to the

public including laser pointers

20. liquids (including water, mercury or alcohol thermometers)

21. previous student/project awards

22. empty tanks that once contained combustibles unless purged

23. photographs or other visual presentations depicting vertebrate animals in other-than-normal conditions

24. active Internet or e-mail connections as part of the display or demonstration of the project.

Acceptable For Display Only-(But Not Operated)

1. projects with unshielded belts, pulleys, chains, and moving

parts with tension or pinch points

2. class III and IV lasers

3. devices which emit loud noises

4. devices which require more than 125V

Acceptable for Display & 0peration With Restrictions

1. Photographs and/or visual depictions if:

a. Credit lines of their origins: “Photograph taken by …” or

“Image taken from …” are attached. (If all photographs

being displayed were taken by the Finalist, one credit lien

prominently displayed indicating that the Finalist took all

photographs is sufficient.)

b. They are from the Internet, magazines, newspapers,

journals, etc., and credit lines are attached.

c. They are photographs of the student and/or her/his family.

d. They are photographs of human subjects for which signed

consent forms are available at the project.

e. They are not deemed offensive by the Scientific Review

Committee or the Rules and Safety Committee.

2. Class II lasers

a. must be student-operated

b. posted sign must read "Laser Radiation: do not stare into beam"

c. must have protective housing that prevents access to beam

d. must be disconnected when not operating.

3. large vacuum tubes or dangerous ray-generating devices must

be shielded properly; mechanical devices with moving parts

must have adequate safeguards

4. any apparatus producing temperatures that will cause physical burns must be adequately insulated.

5. high-voltage (over 12V) equipment must be shielded with a

grounded metal box or cage to prevent accidental contact

6. high-voltage (over 12V) wiring, switches, and metal parts must have adequate insulation and overload safety factors, and must be inaccessible to others

7. electric circuits for 110-volt ac must have a grounded 9-ft.

(minimum) cord. The cord must have sufficient load-carrying

capacity and be approved by underwriters laboratories. 220V

is not allowed.

8. electrical connections in 110-volt circuits must be soldered or

made with approved connectors; connecting wires must be

insulated

9. bare wire and exposed knife switches may be used only in

circuits of 12 volts or less; otherwise, standard enclosed

switches are required

SIZE: Project space limitations are: 76cm (30in) deep; 122cm (48in) wide; 274cm (108in) high including table; tables are 76cm high. Heavy displays should be floor mounted when possible. Floor mounted projects are limited to the same space limitations and cannot be placed in front of a project table. No exceptions. Unless otherwise requested on the entry form, all projects will be assigned a project display table.


 


FHS Science Fair Project Guidelines

(adapted from Rules and Guidelines for the 45th SEFH)

 

·        If you do an experimental project, be sure to maintain a properly organized Laboratory Notebook, which includes everything you do for your project on a day-by-day basis.  Where appropriate, use SI units.  This notebook should be included as part of your project display.  The cover of the book should not show your name, school or teacher, just the project title and time period for the research.

·        As you analyze your results, consult your Supervisor for additional assistance if you do not totally understand something.  If you learn a lot from your project, the chances are, so will others - and that's what good research is all about.

·        After you have completed your project, your next activity is to plan how you will display the results of your project.  You should first go back and review all SEFH rules which pertain to displays.  A good project deserves a good display.  Your display should be neat, well organized, pleasing to look at, and tell the entire story of your research: the project title, questions asked, objectives, experimental procedures, results, and conclusions.  A judge should be able to read everything on your project board from a distance of 3 feet or 1 meter.  Try to minimize the narrative portion and maximize the use of attractive and meaningful charts, graphs, mathematical expressions, models, photographs and tables.  Your display should “sell” your project to the judges without you being present.

·        A neatly prepared Project Abstract is to be prepared and handed out to judges at the FHS Science Fair (a suggested format is included later in these guidelines).  Have multiple copies available to distribute to them. 

·        Enter your project in the proper subject category.  If a project, which is primarily chemistry, is entered in the engineering category, it will be judged as an engineering project.  Similarly, a chemistry project, which uses computers for data analysis, should not be entered in the computer category.  No category changes are allowed.

·        Prior to exhibiting your project review, in detail, the entire project.  Make certain that you understand, and can explain to others (especially judges), all the engineering and scientific principles and variables associated with your project, the procedures followed, the results, and your conclusions.  Be able to propose possible applications for your research and to suggest further studies that might also be done.  Understanding is important -- memorization is not.

·        You should be prepared to present an exciting 3 or 4 minute oral summation of your project to persons with varying technical backgrounds and to answer a broad variety of questions which relate directly, and in some instances indirectly, to your project.

On the judging day, be sure to dress and groom yourself in an appropriate manner and present a positive image of yourself to the judges.  Remember that most of your judges will be professional scientists and engineers from the greater Houston area.  Do not try to "fool" the judges.  If you don't know the answer to a question, say so, and then ask that person if they could give you the answer for future reference (another judge may ask you that same question later in the day).  Do not hesitate to seek advice from your judges, as they are really there both to judge and to assist you.

 

 


Bottom Divider

TeacherWeb
Last Modified: Friday, August 21, 2009
©2009 TeacherWeb, Inc.