Top Divider

 
 
  • Oct292009

    POSTED AT 01:40 PM


    Today I want to remark that I have a bias towards Liberal Arts education.


    First, I feel that a broad sampling of disciplines helps young minds develop plasticity and the ability to synthesize new information quickly. While there are certainly many careers that are perennial in nature and slow to change, I feel that the bulk of careers in the future will require that we workers be able to learn new things on a daily basis.  

    Second, a liberal arts program tends to provide more encounters that get one to think about the meaning behind things. This is a quality of life issue that I worry most institutes ignore. What good is a degree and strong skill set if cannot explain why anything is important?


    Also it is my experience that students from a liberal arts background tend to be more successful in post-graduate settings. I wish I had another source to site on this.


    Now not all liberal arts schools are created equal. Some schools lack a definitive vision of what their liberal arts program is meant to accomplish. It is not a bad idea to ask about what the school’s philosophy is and what they truly mean when they say that they are liberal arts. Also, I have found that you tend to get more intriguing responses from current students and faculty than are provided by admissions professionals and school websites.


    I try to be very open with people about my bias for liberal arts programs AND I do understand that it is not everyone’s cup of tea. Parents, don’t worry. I am not going to force your child to apply to a school that is not a good fit for their mentality or yours. Again, I am only stating my bias for liberal arts programs. Maybe next time I will blog about why I feel all students should be involved in the Fine Arts at some level. 

    Be the first to rate this post
    • Currently 0/5 Stars.
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5

    Oct022009

    POSTED AT 06:31 AM

    Okay, you need to read this:

    Here's the deal: Bob Morse writes for U.S. News and World Report (the creators of the infamous college rankings). Recently I heard Bob speak at a conference and say, "ranking is 100% wrong as the sole basis for school selection." Now he's backed it up on his own blog. The IHEP report basically cautions policy makers not to rely too heavily on rankings. Bob says this himself, "The IHEP report is correct to point out that top academics and boards of trustees at colleges need to consider the many complicated issues that can develop when they use the U.S. News rankings to set policy goals. We fully back the conclusion of the report that institutions need to use rankings responsibly as just one tool for assessment. "

    I would go further to say that students and families need to understand that ranking is just one tool for assessment. Ultimately U.S. News and World Report will continue to provide rankings (along with other publications) because it is what consumers want. But what consumers NEED is to go beyond the rankings and collect additional data to make informed school selections.
    Be the first to rate this post
    • Currently 0/5 Stars.
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5